• Aave saw significant growth in its treasury funds.
• Other DEXs like Uniswap and MakerDAO also witnessed growth in the same area.
• Despite positive treasury growth, tokens could not generate interest from new addresses.
Aave’s Growing Treasury Fund
Aave [AAVE] has seen a growth in its treasury funds, according to a 1 February tweet from Delphi Digital. The growth in treasury funds is an indicator of consistent revenue generation for the protocol, which can be used for various initiatives, such as development, marketing and strategic planning. With a strong and growing treasury fund, investors and stakeholders can have more confidence in the protocol – leading to increased demand for its tokens.
Comparison with Competitors
Compared to its competitors such as BenQI and Compound, Aave’s treasury funds grew materially in the last three months. However, other DEXes such as Uniswap [UNI] and MakerDAO [MKR] also witnessed growth in this area. According to Dune Analytics, Uniswap’s treasury funds increased over the last few months despite the volatility observed in the crypto market; similarly MakerDAO weathered the storm and saw growth due mostly to its Real World Assets (RWA) generating most of its revenue.
Despite the growing funds of these protocols, their tokens couldn’t generate interest from new addresses according to data from Santiment; UNI took a particularly hard hit here but AAVE outperformed others despite declining network growth.
The increasing revenue generated by Aave provides stability and assurance to investors which can lead to increased demand for its tokens. This is encouraging news for many who are watching out for developments within decentralized finance space that provide secure investments with high returns on investment (ROI).
Aave’s growing treasury fund is a positive sign for the protocol as it showcases consistent revenue generation while providing stability and assurance to investors; compared to competitors like Uniswap and MakerDAO – it highlighted Aave’s financial strength despite declining token performance amongst some individual protocols